Weird on Wind
On this blog we’ve already covered many of the common objections to wind power, ranging from cost to wind farms requiring electricity to start up. But there’s quite a few odder myths out there – let’s have a look at some of the strangest.
Weird Myth 1: Wind turbines make their own clouds.
The source for this particular myth appears to be this Daily Mail article. It covers a peculiar phenomenon that occurs during intermittent low-wind conditions at an offshore wind farm. The movement of the turbine blades pushes up warmer air from just above the sea into the colder, drier air above. This causes the moisture in the warm air to condense, creating low-level fog around the turbines – even when there’s none on land.
Of course, this phenomenon only occurs with offshore turbines – the air above land doesn’t contain as much moisture as the air above the sea, for obvious reasons. Even then, it only occurs when the wind is very low, as otherwise the air around the blades would be pushed away too quickly for the moisture to condense.
Myth status: True – but only with offshore wind!
Weird Myth 2: Wind turbines kill newts
This myth seems to be based on misinterpretations of reports from several sites around the UK where wind farm development has been controversial because of the presence of rare newts. For example, the power from the Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm will come ashore at Weyborne, when the farm is completed towards the end of 2011. The sub-station for this project was sited on land occupied by Greater Crested Newts, which are protected under British law. To ensure minimum disruption of the newts’ habitat, AREVA secured a Newt Licence from Natural England and constructed a newt fence, to give them safe corridors through the habitat while keeping them away from the construction area.
Like many myths around wind, this one is founded on a lack of understanding of the Environmental Impact Assessment developers are required to carry out before constructing any new wind farm. Developers have to show that the ecological impact of construction will not negatively impact on local wildlife populations, like birds and bats.
Myth status: False
Weird Myth 3: Wind turbines are targeted by UFOs
A wind turbine at Fen Farm in Lincolnshire was briefly the source of significant national interest when, following a mysterious crashing noise heard in the middle of the night, local residents awoke to find that one of the turbines on the nearby farm had lost one of its blades and severely bent the remaining ones.
Reporters on the scene heard reports from residents claiming that they’d seen mysterious lights near the wind turbine in question the evening before. This led to The Sun splashing the story with the headline ‘UFO hits wind turbine’.
Unfortunately, the reality was significantly less exciting – the report of mysterious lights happened well before the turbine broke, and investigation discovered that the breakage was a consequence of freak material failure.
Myth status: False
We’re always interested to hear your stories of the bizarre things people say about wind power – let us know if you hear anything!
Blog Archives
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (3)
Comments
How about 'Wind Turbine Sindrome' and the supposed bad effects on children - please see my video response to the Daily Mail article pushing this rediculus idea, it's here...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAsToB_4ZHw
..enjoy!! :-))
That's great - very nice video! You can add videos to your MyPlanet profile, by the way - you should certainly add that one!
We're planning a piece on WTS soon - it is a bizarre myth too!
A passionate video, but isn't the issue simply one of establishing proper setbacks? Especially to limit noise at night?
The problem with doing so is that noise conditions vary substantially from location to location - a simply setback rule wouldn't necessarily lead to the most effective method of assessing developments for impact on local people. Noise regulations like ETSU-R-97 are a far better way to go.
Yes, but as you say, conditions vary substantially from location to location, making prediction of noise levels quite difficult, particularly with an array of sources. Hence a starting setback would seem wise.
There is already a planning guideline of a setback of about 700m - although it's a guideline rather than a requirement. It's fairly reasonable - the majority of wind farms are inaudible from 500m away.
ETSU is insufficient as it stands as it takes averages for background noise levels and allows higher night time noise levels than daytime. Basically its a perverted version of BS4142, but really perverted.
Even at 1 km people can suffer as is the case in the fens where a family has had to leave home. They have also had their council tax reduced and the RICS aknowledges now that wind farms affect house prices.